<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Um&#8230; Dylan: &#8216;Folk&#8217; or &#8216;Pop &amp; Rock&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/</link>
	<description>Music. Innovation. People. Places. Other stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading your (useful) last two posts, I&#039;m left wondering if you can advise how best to handle all the stray tracks in my collection – songs which aren&#039;t from an album. In coverflow view these butt into my otherwise beautifully flowing album artworks with the ugly label &quot;Unknown Album&quot;, generally also without album art. Aside from omitting them from iTunes altogether, can you suggest a way to tidy up this niggle?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;David Sondrsen (NZ)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading your (useful) last two posts, I&#8217;m left wondering if you can advise how best to handle all the stray tracks in my collection – songs which aren&#8217;t from an album. In coverflow view these butt into my otherwise beautifully flowing album artworks with the ugly label &#8220;Unknown Album&#8221;, generally also without album art. Aside from omitting them from iTunes altogether, can you suggest a way to tidy up this niggle?</p>
<p>David Sondrsen (NZ)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back Andrew...&lt;br/&gt;I did a similar thing little while back..logical groupings. All house, techno, disco and post 1980 funk is simply under Disco, as thats what it is, in its myriad forms...electronic and strange German groups fit in there quite nicely too&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Similarly I have pop (rock, pop, alt, punk etc), soul (older funk, gospel, reggae, dub, downbeat, acid jazz, r&#039;n&#039;b) and Jazz (jazz, world and the like). I haven&#039;t figured out country yet....&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Works for me...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back Andrew&#8230;<br />I did a similar thing little while back..logical groupings. All house, techno, disco and post 1980 funk is simply under Disco, as thats what it is, in its myriad forms&#8230;electronic and strange German groups fit in there quite nicely too</p>
<p>Similarly I have pop (rock, pop, alt, punk etc), soul (older funk, gospel, reggae, dub, downbeat, acid jazz, r&#8217;n'b) and Jazz (jazz, world and the like). I haven&#8217;t figured out country yet&#8230;.</p>
<p>Works for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn</title>
		<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 11:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago I got sick of all the genres I&#039;d made up to classify my music. I realised that I wasn&#039;t a librarian and I didn&#039;t owe it to anyone to classify music in micro-genres. So I went with the set that CDDB use, and it&#039;s worked well for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago I got sick of all the genres I&#8217;d made up to classify my music. I realised that I wasn&#8217;t a librarian and I didn&#8217;t owe it to anyone to classify music in micro-genres. So I went with the set that CDDB use, and it&#8217;s worked well for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubber</title>
		<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problem: I already use the Grouping tag. It&#039;s used to identify NZ tracks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem: I already use the Grouping tag. It&#8217;s used to identify NZ tracks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a clash of Taxonomies, you private identification vs rest of the world. Think user tagging vs groups on Flickr. You might think that Dylan is Folk, but to be accepted in the Pop &amp; Rock group he would have to meet certain &quot;rules&quot; defined by the rest of the pop &amp; rock group.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;iTunes also has a grouping column, I belive it&#039;s hidden by default but it might give a bit more room to add extra classification.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a clash of Taxonomies, you private identification vs rest of the world. Think user tagging vs groups on Flickr. You might think that Dylan is Folk, but to be accepted in the Pop &#038; Rock group he would have to meet certain &#8220;rules&#8221; defined by the rest of the pop &#038; rock group.</p>
<p>iTunes also has a grouping column, I belive it&#8217;s hidden by default but it might give a bit more room to add extra classification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewdubber.com/2006/10/um-dylan-folk-or-pop-rock/#comment-1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re concerned about the lopsidedness of your African collection, delve deep into Madagascar via David Lindley&#039;s  &quot;World out of Time&quot; stuff.&lt;br/&gt;Sort of modern-time Alan Lomax&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers&lt;br/&gt;J]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re concerned about the lopsidedness of your African collection, delve deep into Madagascar via David Lindley&#8217;s  &#8220;World out of Time&#8221; stuff.<br />Sort of modern-time Alan Lomax</p>
<p>Cheers<br />J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
